The Question Part 1: "Research question: The Humanitarian Crises & the Humanitarian Action Operations in South Sudan:  Critically examine and analyze the humanitarian action operation on the ground. Present at least 3 challenges and dilemmas phased (Operational, strategic, programmatic, ethical). How were they addressed? What would you have done differently? Relate to the following points:  - Main characteristics of the crisis, the settings and wider context in which it evolved.  - Local needs, vulnerabilities & capacities. - Main actors, roles, collaboration & coordination, their efficiency.  - Challenges & dilemmas faced in different phases and levels.  - Potential Long-term impacts of the humanitarian program in different aspects.  - Lessons learned. Think of 3 recommendations for the future. Part 2  Shortly reflect on 2 of the following cross-cutting most burning issues of the humanitarian space:  1. The Humanitarian Principles' role in modern humanitarian settings and action.  2. Localization (Capacity & resilience building)  3. Leadership & Civil-Military-Humanitarian Interaction  4. 'Do No Harm'- Protection & Gender Mainstreaming  5. Innovation & Entrepreneurship in Humanitarian settings (Incl. 'Cash-based programming')  6. The Triple Nexus: Humanitarian-Development-Peace Building Nexus. Relate to the following guiding points: What role/significance do they play in humanitarian action of today? How can they impact people, programs, power dynamics? Can they improve/harm efforts to achieve some common goals? What possible challenges/risks do they bring along? Have we seen progress (failure/success) in this regard so far? Think out of the box. Analyze and present ideas in support/against, pros/cons- based on relevant examples and publications. IMPORTANT: Word limit 2000-3000 (excluding cover, reference list, appendices); Font size 11pt; Line spacing 1.5. Use at least 2-3 peer-reviewed publications. You may choose your preferred citation method to be used throughout