Browse our Free Essay examples and check out our Writing tools to get your assignments done.
Search and seizure, fair
or foul? Do you think the current laws are fair to all or do they go too far
(foul)?
Search and seizure, fair or foul?
Do you think the current laws are fair to all or do they go too far
(foul)? This is not an opinion piece. I want at
least 2-3 peer-reviewed, text, or legal journal citations on this work
with source material cited at the bottom of your work.
Search
and Seizure, fair or foul?
Students’ name
Institution
Course name/number
Instructor
Due date
Search
and Seizure, fair or foul?
The
current rules governing search and seizure revolve three prime question. The
first question is whether police seized or searched anybody or anything. Is the
answer is yes, the rule leavers police’s actin uncontrolled (Mannheimer, 2018).
On the flip side if the answer is yes, what justification must the police
officer have-reasonable suspicion, probable cause or something different?
Ultimately, what protocols must police adhere to-must the police ask for
permission from the magistrate, or should they search the person first then
defend themselves in the suppression hearing later?
In defining seizure and search the most significant question to consider is the first one, whether a given police tactic is not a seizure or search as outline in the Fourth amendment that police are a allowed to free use their tactics of their wish without legal restrictions. The Fourth Amendment defines searches as the police tactics that infringes a reasonable expectation of privacy ((Mannheimer, 2018). The amendment adds that a reasonable expectation is a type expectation any other individual is entitled to have. For instance the police of the authority to see and hear what general public can hear without protection by the Amendment protecting him. However when a police crosses the boundary and sees what members of public are not allowed to see and hear is construed as a search. Police action would amount to search...
