Write an article on sam slime: a reflective analysis of the scenarios Paper must be at least 1750 words. Please, no plagiarized work! Evidence of political actions catastrophically influencing numerous aspects of individuals substantiates the point that stealing through the political process is morally more reprehensible than stealing done individually. One of the evident illustrations of abusive political processes has been presented in the case study “Sam Slime” which conspicuously proves how easily the political process, just as the individual corruption, can damage individual interest. In both Scene 1 and 2 of the case study “Sam Slime”, there is an act of stealing or the illegal taking of another person’s property ($50) without his freely-given consent. Whereas the stealing by an individual criminal in the first scene is legally challengeable, forcing the thief to pay for it, there is no such provision in the second scenario where the act of snatching has been performed by a more systematic process of the political process which makes the situation of the victim more lamentable. The commonality between these two scenarios is that the same person is the real sufferer in the stealing by the individual as well as the political process, and the breakdown of this commonality is in the fact that the individual is acknowledged as the victim in Scene 1 whereas the same person turns out to be the criminal in Scene 2 where stealing is actually done by the political process. Therefore, in my profound perception on the basis of based on an understanding of economic theory and ethical philosophy, stealing through the political process is morally more reprehensible than stealing done individually and regular political expropriation of another individual’s income is exactly similar to slavery.A reflective analysis of the case study “Sam Slime” based on economic theory and ethical philosophy brings out three essential points: (1) there are significant commonalities between the two scenarios presented in the case study which refer to the differences and similarities between them, (2) stealing through the political process is morally more reprehensible than stealing done individually.