Rhetorical Analysis of 'Thank God for the Atomic Bomb'

Student's Name

Institutions

Course Name/Number

Instructor

Due Date

Rhetorical Analysis of 'Thank God for the Atomic Bomb'

The article Thank God for the Atomic Bomb, by Paul Fussell is about the Atomic Bomb which was drooped in Hiroshima and Nagasaki by the United States of America in 1946. The bomb marked the end of World War II since it led to the killing of not less than 120,000 people in the epicenter of World War II, which was Japan.  Seeing the loss subjected the country to massive loss of life; they surrendered from attacking the Rivals, The United States of America, and thus the Second World War came to an end. Fussel writes the article Thank God for the Atomic Bomb, to explain to those who were against his opinion how the bomb could have been dropped, bring the Second World War into and save the lives of soldiers who fought the battle.

In the article, Fussell is seen to contempt the individuals who do not concur with his logic fallacy of Ah hominem in several circumstances throughout the article. Such instances in the contest include: 'I do not get the log of demanding his ass get shot off. I realized that he did not'. Sherry Michael was feeling secure while resting in his home without expecting to experience any danger. The bomb was dropped. Sherry was going eight months old in the calamity of falling out of his pram. It was simple to guess with success the favorable side of each individual after knowing that the Japanese had captured Alsop at Hong Kong at the beginning of 1942. At the same time, Joravsky encounters fatal contact with the Japanese'. Glenn Gray wasn't among the armed individuals, and he neither support any of them. Even though he uses such statements with perfection when he encounters them for the first time, he perceives them as arguments when one participates in every all his examples. One finds that he is left with just one: The individual individuals lacking experience in battle cannot make general stamen or conclude about war.

Fussel manages to support his arguments about war, but his statements are made...