Contact Information
- 15800 Progress, Mora, MN, 55051
- info@preessays.com
- +1-786-220-3368
Browse our Free Essay examples and check out our Writing tools to get your assignments done.
NEGOTIATION EXERCISE - DECISION SHEET
RETAILER
REPRESENTATIVE__________mohammed________________________________ MANUFACTURER
REPRESENTATIVE________luke___________________________
A.
Quantity
to be ordered
Current style(s) business
shirts__________50_______________ %
Knit sport shirts
______________________50______________ %
Overall increase/decrease in total units
purchased____100________
Minimum Qty to be ordered
______600_____________________
B.
Retail
margin for retailer ______3%__ per shirt
C.
Advertising
Frequency_______twice
monthly____________________________________________________
Cost
split _____________50-50______________________________________________ Content
Responsibility ______full control___________________________________________
D.
Shelf
Space change________10______ % increase/decrease
Number
to be supplied
Contribution
per trolley_____________________400_______
When
to supply the trolley(s) to Retailer________next
shipment
F. Order time________7_______days
Any other
particulars:____increase in demand, if demand is not increased back to
H. Payment, discount
period ____12________days
Period of time_______________3
months___________
Cost responsibility _____________33%__manufacturer 67%retailer_______
Nature of any agreement
reached:__________agreed that if supply is maintained commitment will last at
least a year__________________________________
We hereby agree that the decisions outlined above are agreed to by both parties;
Manufacturer:_____________________________________________________________
Retailer:_____________________________
Report 45% due Friday 28 May @ 11PM
Your
Name and Student ID:
Your
role in the negotiation exercise:
Your
negotiation partner’s name and student ID:
Your
negotiation partner’s role:
The
word limit is 2000 words +/- 10%. Type the assignment in report format using Times
New Roman 12 with single line spacing. All referencing must be in Harvard style.
Attach your Decision sheet with the
template before submitting the assignment. Decision sheet, executive summary, table
of contents, any other tables, diagrams, references, and appendices are not
counted in the word limit 2000. Read the guidelines in the learning guide
and on the vUWS. Submit to the turn it in the link in Assessment 3 folder.
There is no cover sheet.
Write
below this line.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Introduction
The retailer negotiated with the
manufacturer on how they would carry out a business transaction between the two
with some goals to achieve. One of the goals of negotiating with the
manufacturer is to enjoy reduced operational costs as a retailer. Olimovich et al. (2020) argue that marketing is crucial for any
business that wants to succeed in any industry. It helps attract new customer
customers to purchase from the business establishment and allows a company to
retain customer loyalty to guarantee repeat purchases. Although marketing is
beneficial to the retailer, it requires enormous capital investment and would
consume a substantial amount of its profits. Therefore, the retailer considered
it helpful to negotiate marketing cost-sharing with the manufacturer. Second,
the retailer aimed at getting cash discounts from the negotiation with the
manufacturer. Profit is the primary purpose for every company to enter into
business. Business owners strive to maximize the return on investments they
make in the business. Reduced operational cost is the prime way to realizes
higher profit margins. A cash discount is another strategy for enhancing
company profit. Through the negotiation, the parties agreed that the retailer
would enjoy a cash discount on timely payment. Retailers would use timely
payment as an opportunity to reduce the cost of purchases through cash
discounts and sell the product at a normal price to the final to make extra
income. The parties used an accommodator-oriented relationship to arrive at the
above business transaction goals. According to Gerlach (2020), this negotiation approach helps parties develop interest in each other's
ideas and promote long-term relationships. The negotiation between the retailer
and the manufacturer agreed on several aspects that supported business
transactions between the two parties. Besides, the negotiation resulted in a
long-term business relationship between the manufacturers since they agreed on
the minimum order quantity and the duration within which the contract between
the two should remain unaltered. The report explores the rationale for the
retailer and manufacturer agreeing with the negotiation outcomes.
Why the retailer agreed to the outcome of negotiation
Short-term benefits that made the retailer agree to the
results of the negotiation