Contact Information
- 15800 Progress, Mora, MN, 55051
- info@preessays.com
- +1-786-220-3368
Browse our Free Essay examples and check out our Writing tools to get your assignments done.
Patriot
Act in America
Student’s
Name
Institutional
Affiliation
Patriot
Act in America
Introduction
National
security is an import part of human being since it touches on how people
interact with each other and more so, regarding safeguarding lives. In case of
events that pose threat to life, government have the mandate of formulating
policies that can bring back sanity concerning safety of borders and the
country in general. One such a threating case was witnessed the United States
on September 11, 2001. This terrorism situation involved coordinated attacks by
the Al-Qaeda which led to immediate death of 265 people. In response to this
attack, the American initiated a la that would increase more chance to probe
into people’s way of life of a way of obstructing any manifestation of criminal
activities. As a result, the P.A.T.R.I.O.T Act (Providing Appropriate Tools Required to Intercept and Obstruct
Terrorism Act of 2001) was enacted with the key agenda of avoiding such an
occurrence in the future. The Patriot Act benefited the U.S. by simplifying
criminal investigating, obstruction criminal plans before they manifest in
domestic land, improving border security, promoting social-economic prospects.
However, the Patriot Law can be contested for limiting people’s privacy rights
and giving law enforcement too much power.
How Patriot Act has Benefited
Americans
Simplifying
criminal investigating
To
begin with, the Patriot Act benefited the United States by making criminal and
forensic investigations more effective. The major deliberation by the 107
Congress was to ensure that Patriot Act was passed for the greater good for
safeguarding the nation. The decision of the then president George Bush was
guided the ability of the Act to simply the hasten the speed at which criminal
investigator could detect and control crime. In an article “Law,
politics, and populism in the U.S.A. P.A.T.R.I.O.T. Act,” Rajh (2019) argue that before the incidence of 9/11,
the process of accessing crime scenes was very bureaucratic. For the Law before
the Patriot Act stipulated that when accessing people’s data, investigating
officers could only demand for information from common carriers such as public
places, location storage, and vehicle rental premise. This approach, according
to Jaeger, McClure, Bertot, and Snead (2004), is complicated and increases the
chance of failing to intercept a criminal gang on time.
Additionally, controlling terrorism requires argent and
robust which was not feasible under the old regime of Crime control Law. For
example, before the introduction of the Patriot Act, the Federal Bureau (FBI)
of Investigation could only demand information to people who they have tracked
bearing fact beyond reasonable doubles that they have something to do with an
incidence. This is one was of delay justice and creating more for criminals to
reorganize themselves to hind evidences and even flee. The new Patriot Ac
provides that information can be collected from any person either by recalling
recorded files, phone conversation, and any other for digital or written data (United
States Public Law. Sec 355 (2)). Therefore, I
can now be deemed simpler and easier to counter terrorism since the FBI has
more authority to access and determine possibility of threat following people’s
activities.
Obstruction
of criminal plans before they manifest in domestic land
Controlling
crimes is better than managing the aftermath of a terrorist attack. For
example, taking the incident February 26, 1993 (Bomb explosion in New York),
April 19, 1995 (Bomb ribs killing 168 and injuring over 700 people in
Oklahoma), and the most fierce case of the 9/11, it is evident that prior to
the Patriot Act, it was near impossible to obstruct pending criminal attack (Jaeger et al., (2004). This is a major way of
saving people’s lives within the domestic soli. Therefore, as a way of ensuring
people are save within their country, the trade between privacy and uncovering
illegal activities was important.
Criminal
masterminds are conducted and fructified through a chain of communication which
can only be unraveled if the investigating officers re accorded rights of
tracking flow and sharing of information (
GET THE WHOLE PAPER!