need an apa style format for this case study.C.M. is an 89-year-old woman who presents with her daughter to the provider’s office. The daughter is concerned because her mother has not been eating well. She has been having bleeding gums. Her past medical history includes HTN and Hypothyroidism. A, 24-hour diet recall reveals an intake of approximately 1100-calorie. The patient lives alone and the daughter lives nearby. Since she doesn't drive, her daughter shops for her. The patient usually likes to cook and eat light meals. Her Vital signs shows T: 37 ° C , P: 72 bpm/min,  R:12 breaths / min, BP 104/64 mmHg Weight: 104 lb. Her weight at the time of her last visit 3 months ago was 115 lb. Her height is 5 feet 1 inch. Her oral mucosa is dry. Her dentures seem loose. Poor skin turgor noted.Writing PromptsDevelop a problem list from the objective and subjective data.What nursing diagnoses can be derived from the problems list?What should be included in the plan of care?Calculate the patient’s body mass index.How many calories a day does this patient need to maintain her current weight?What laboratory studies would help determine the patient’s nutritional status?Grading RubricCase Study Rubric.docxPreview the documentSubmission GuidelinesOnly doc, docx, and odt file types are accepted - PDF files are not accepted.  You may download OpenOffice for free under Pages.RubricRN 200 - Case StudyRN 200 - Case StudyCriteria    Ratings    PtsThis criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeResponse to prompts30 to >27.0 ptsExcellentResponse to prompts demonstrates thorough understanding of the case. Insightful and in-depth discussion of all key points is evident.27 to >24.0 ptsGoodResponse to prompts demonstrates considerable understanding of the case and identifies most of the key points.24 to >22.5 ptsFairResponse to prompts demonstrates some understanding of the case and identifies few key points22.5 to >0 ptsPoorResponse to prompts demonstrates limited understanding of the case study and identifies few key points.30 ptsThis criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeSupports the prompts with Rationale25 to >22.5 ptsExcellentProvides complete, accurate, logical evidence-based rationale for all responses22.5 to >20.0 ptsGoodProvides evidence-based rationale for some response20 to >18.75 ptsFairProvides insufficient and/or non-evidence based rationale18.75 to >0 ptsPoorProvides no/irrelevant rationale.25 ptsThis criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomePlan of care25 to >22.5 ptsExcellentOutlines a complete plan of care with relevant and thorough list of patient centered interventions that displays critical thinking22.5 to >20.0 ptsGoodOutlines a partial plan of care with relevant list of patient-centered interventions20 to >18.75 ptsFairOutlines a plan of care with a list of minimum patient-centered interventions18.75 to >0 ptsPoorOutlines an incomplete plan of care with irrelevant interventions25 ptsThis criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeWriting Mechanics10 to >9.0 ptsExcellentProfessionalism evident in spelling, grammar, sentence structure, general use of the English language and clarity of writing9 to >8.0 ptsGoodMinor errors in spelling, grammar, sentence structure, general use of the English language, and clarity of writing8 to >7.5 ptsFairSeveral mistakes in spelling, grammar, sentence structure, general use of the English language and clarity of writing7.5 to >0 ptsPoorWriting has major errors in spelling, grammar, sentence structure, general use of the English language and poor clarity of writing10 ptsThis criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeAPA Guidelines10 to >9.0 ptsExcellentUses APA guidelines accurately and consistently to cite varied recent sources9 to >8.0 ptsGoodUses APA guidelines with few violations to cite varied recent sources8 to >7.5 ptsFairReflects insufficient knowledge of APA guidelines7.5 to >0 ptsPoorAPA format/guidelines not used.10 ptsTotal Points: 100Submission DetailsGrade: 41.5 (100 pts possible)Graded Anonymously: noView Rubric Evaluation