this is a case study of arbitration u should add more cases it is about challenge of arbitrators[04:14, 27/01/2021] Sr: Sierra Fishing Co & Others v Hasan Said Farran & Others [2015] EWHC 140 (Comm): on bias on arbitrator under s 24 EAA. A v B & X [2011] EWHC 2345 (Comm) and see the case note by Hew Dundas, “Conflicts of interest and arbitrator disclosure revisited: barristers acting as counsel and as arbitrator” (2012) 78 Arbitration, 72-80. ASM Shipping Ltd v Harris & Others [2008] 1 Lloyd’s Rep 61 ASM Shipping Ltd of India v TTMI Ltd of England [2005] EWHC 2238 (Comm) – there is no need for the applicant to show it suffered substantial injustice in cases of bias. Bandwidth Shipping Corp v Intaari (The “Magdalena Oldendorff”) [2008] 1 Lloyd’s Rep 7 Liverpool Roman Catholic Archdiocesan Trust v Goldberg [2002] 4 All ER 950 Porter v Magill [2002] 2 AC 357 (read but note that this is a 155 page judgment! Read only the sections on bias, ie pp396-400, 452-457, 480-481, 488-495, 511) Challenge of Judge Broms of the Iran-US Claims Tribunal, 16(5) Mealey’s IAR B1 (2001) AT&T Corp & Another v Saudi Cable [2000] 2 Lloyd’s Rep 127 Locabail (UK) Ltd v Bayfields Properties [2000] 1 All ER 65 Himpurna California Energy Ltd v Republic of Indonesia, XXV YBCA 186 (2000) Smith v American Arbitration Association, 233 F.3d 502 (7th Cir Dec 1, 2000)