Browse our Free Essay examples and check out our Writing tools to get your assignments done.
Summarize RICO and one other ACT identified in the text regarding Crime Statutes aimed at
combating organized crime. As part of your response identify their key
strengths and weaknesses. Also be sure to include your supported view regarding
the effectiveness (or lack of) for each as it regards combating organized
crime.
CO5: Analyze major statutes and legislation aimed at
combating organized Crime
So, you
will discuss, RICO and ONE more ACT
Some ACTS are in RED from the text below
You will GET YOUR ANSWER from the reading BELOW. You do further research ONLINE. But Act has to be selected from this reading
References
Abadinsky,
H. (2013). Organized crime (10th ed.). Wadsworth Publishing.
Baum, D.
(2001). Citizen Coors: A grand family saga of business, politics and
beer. Harper Paperbacks.
Jacobs,
J.B., & Portnoi, D.D. (2007). Administrative criminal law & procedure
in the Teamsters Union: What has been achieved after (nearly) twenty years. Berkeley
Journal of Employment & Labor Law, 28(2). 429-493
Crime
Statutes Aimed at Combating Organized Crime
Student’s
Name
Institution
Course
Name/Number
Instructor
Due
Date
Crime
Statutes Aimed at Combating Organized Crime
RICO
RICO is an act passed by U.S. federal law to address
criminal and civil cases in the country. According to Venator-Santiago (2017),
the statute primarily targeted white-collar crime and organized crime. It was
enacted in 1970. The law is broad, so civil and organization parties use it to
prosecute against all sorts of organizations, both illegal and legal. It
permits the prosecution of all persons involved in corrupt enterprises. Individuals are deemed to have violated RICO
when they engage in a pattern of racketeering activity linked with the
organization. The statute outline about 35 crimes amounting to racketeering,
including drug dealing, murder, arson, gambling, kidnapping, and bribery.
RICO Act has a far-reaching scope and imprecise
language. Hence private administration of the statute via civil lawsuits
supplements the government’s administration properties. The Act considers it
reasonable to award treble commercial fraud victims that come within the
language of the Act (Venator-Santiago, 2017). Awarding damages serve as a restriction
to enterprises that have occasioned social damage by transacting illegally.
There is no criminal conviction necessary with a civil
case under civil RICO. The complainants only need to prove that the ongoing
organized crime occurred more likely than not (Venator-Santiago, 2017). Hence
RICO has been utilized in every sort of civil offense to allege transgression.
Also, in RICO criminal cases, jury and judges are deprived of the power to judge
a negative suggestion from a respondent’s supplication of the Fifth Amendment freedom
against self-accusation. However, in RICO civil case, such prohibition does not
exist.
The Hobbs Act
U.S. Congress enacted The Hobbs Act in 1951 to address the issues of attempted robbery, burglar, and extortion involving local and international trade. The Act’s primary role was to deter racketeering in labor conflicts, but it has broadened its wings to curb...
