Browse our Free Essay examples and check out our Writing tools to get your assignments done.
Why does the
court see this case as involving a quasi-contract as opposed to an actual
contract?
What other
case law does the court rely on in finding precedent/support for compensating
Reisenfeld?
Does this
decision appear to follow the golden rule guideline outlined in Chapter 2 (pp.
27 and 28)?
Describe
another example of an implied-in-fact or quasi-contract that you have
experienced or is mentioned in the text
Show Me My Money
(Reisenfeld & Company v. The Network Group Inc., p. 313)
Name
Institution Affiliation
Why
does the court see this case as involving a quasi-contract as opposed to an
actual contract?
A quasi-contract implies an obligation of
two parties to each other imposed by law independent of the original agreements
between them. The reason as to why the court consider this case as an
implied-in-law contract is due to the involvement of BSI. The actual contract
in the case involved Reisenfeld and Network Group, but due to the fraud case
between BIS and the Network sole shareholder, BSI is relieved its obligations
of paying commission to Network Group which constitute into a quasi-contract
(Kubasek, 2013).
What
other case law does the court rely on in finding precedent/support for
compensating Reisenfeld?
The court find precedent in the context of contractor/subcontractor in that when the owner does not pay the contractor and consequently the subcontractor does not receive payment, the latter...
