Competing Visions of Statesmanship: Feminism and Queer Theory Research Paper Assignment

Student’s Name

Institutional Affiliation

Course

Professor’s Name

Date

History of the “Pro-family” Movement

People hold different beliefs and reservations on matters of family and social structures.  The pro-family conservatives are the people that hold on to or encourage the traditional family structure and the values therein. Pro-family people oppose birth control, abortion and oppose any other structure that deviates from the ancient family structure of father, mother, and children—they are against gay relationships and the leading critics of LGBTQ[1]. The perception of pro-family conservatives is that birth controls, abortion, and the LGBTQ are a threat to the normal family structure and deviate from the normal. The pro-family have a movement that includes the larger conservative movement and deals with matters involving natural family and sexuality. In the united states, the movement traces its roots to the cultural backlash to the 1960s Marxist revolution. The revolution changed family-centered society and swapped Judeo-Christian morality[2].  The pro-family movement could not be needed before the 1960s since family values in the western world were overwhelmingly on consensus. Later with the leadership of President Ronald Reagan in the 1980s, Americans bought the idea of the pro-family movement. The 1960s revolution was grounded on cultural Marxism of Herbert Marcuse’s Frankfort School but not in the Marxist orthodoxy of Lenin and Stalin. The revolt did not envision a “workers revolt” but sexual anarchy aimed at dismantling the Judeo-Christian civilization. Judeo-Christian came as a standard liberal phrase to mean the idea that the western values rest on the religious consensus that comprised Jews[3]. The underground “gay” movement, which was facing some resistance although gaining some popularity, was the reason for the rise of the pro-family movement to counter the gay movement. Harry Hay was the leader and the pioneer of the gay movement and was referred to as the father of the underground army of gay activists in America. Thus the gay movement was the immediate cause of culture wars that broke in the 1960s and are still in play today.  The American Marxist revolution was a “sexual revolution” that succeeded in vindicating Marcuse’s destructive vision and later became the fundamental tool of one-world government elites for reducing the magnitude of resistance against their domination through breaking the family-inclined society. The centered family society is, however, the source of stability, self-sufficiency, and strength.

The pro-family movement was under attack from the “gays” whose primary goal was to promote heterosexual promiscuity, which involves having sexual activity with different partners and frequently and at the same time being indiscriminate in choosing these sexual partners[4]. Also, the gay movement was also behind the scenes of legitimizing homosexual sodomy. Alfred Kinsey, a homosexual activist, had this motive in his 1940s and 50s in homosexual activism whereby they attacked marriage-based sexual ethic and termed it as socially harmful and repressive. The gay movement caused the introduction of the modern porn industry, where the first porn magazine was published by Hefner, “Kinsey’s pamphleteer.” [5]The magazine led to court battles, and sexual morality was systematically reformed by cultural Marxist elites on the United States Supreme Court. Contraception was on-demand to facilitate “fornication without consequences” A case, “Griswold v Connecticut 1966”, another case on abortion as a backup for failed contraception “Roe v Wade 1973” and the legalization of homosexual sodomy “Lawrence v Texas 2003.”[6]

There was a wide gap where there was silence between “Roe v Wade” and “Lawrence v Texas which was achieved as a result of the election of Reagan, and that was the begging of the rise of the Pro-family movement and became a major political force. There is the need to understand that the real course of the cultural war is the supreme court, although street activism is my work. By 1981 Reagan had managed to make the Marxist near-collapse in matters nation’s family and the economic infrastructure. Also, the force of LGBT had been hit hard when Reagan appointed Antonin Scalia to the supreme court. With the help of Scalia, Reagan stopped the sexual revolution in its tracks, thus making the pro-family movement begin restoring family values in the country and has diligently been restored.[7] Elites prevented Reagan from installing a second Scalia, Robert Bork, and was compelled by unparalleled political “borking” and wanted to fill the seat with Antony Kennedy. Antony Kennedy is to be blamed for the dysfunctional state of the family in the united states; he was culturally destructive[8]. Kennedy wrote the majority in all five SCOTUS opinions that established homosexual cultural supremacy in the united states and still operating today. One of the significant decisions that he Kennedy made was the “unconstitutional Obergefell v Hodges (2015) gay marriage decision.”[9]

The Future of Pro-Family movement

It is worthy to admit that after Obergefell, the pro-family has lost the culture war, although there is still hope, and it is not only to claim the loss grounds for the pro-family movement but probably a rehearsal of the gains that have been gained by the movement over the past 50 years. There is the possibility of restringing the place of the natural family...