Below is a general outline of the paper structure I'm looking for. Please imagine the reader has no idea what the ethical theory of cultural relativism is. Please make sure to clearly define what it is before you begin with the critique. Please make sure to adequately cover all the author's supporting arguments. Please refer to the author by his last name. Intro (should include the author's thesis statement and a snapshot of the supporting arguments/claims) While there are important lessons to learn from reflecting on cultural relativism, the core holding of the theory should be rejected.   Author's Supporting Argument #1 - 2.3 The Cultural Differences Argument   Author's Supporting Argument #2 - 2.4 The Consequences of Taking Cultural Relativism Seriously   Author's Supporting Argument #3 - 2.6 How All Cultures Have Some Values in Common   Author's Supporting Argument #4 - 2.7 Judging a Cultural Practice to Be Undesirable Conclusion (restating the thesis statement and summarizing and supporting arguments/claims)   **** Important state you position on the matter