Contact Information
- 15800 Progress, Mora, MN, 55051
- info@preessays.com
- +1-786-220-3368
Browse our Free Essay examples and check out our Writing tools to get your assignments done.
The main document to use in answering the questions is
the article named “Not Bad Kids, Just Bad Choices” and the other articles
are just support materials
The questions that SHOULD be answered in the essay are:
1. What is the article’s topic? Make sure to
include this in your introductory paragraph.
2. What is the author’s argument? Put the main
points of the article in your own words.
3. Which socio-legal method does the author
use? Where/how do you see it at work?
4. What evidence does the author use to support
her/his argument?
5. What does the author’s research reveal
(directly and/or indirectly) about the relationship between law and society?
Refer to 3 course readings in your analysis.
Answering the question from the Article, "Not Bad Kids,
Just Bad Choices."
Name
Institution/Affiliation
Date
“Not Bad Kids, Just Bad Choices”:
Governing School Safety through Choice” is an article written
by Zachary Levinsky. The author aims at demonstrating the impacts of the school
zero-tolerance policy in Ontario by utilizing the Safe Schools Act. As a
result, Zachary Levinsky indicates that the use of these policies as tools of
governance in schools bears more implications than those illustrated in various
pieces of literature (Levinsky, 2016). Most
of the zero-tolerance policies are characterized by the push to exclude
students as such they do not go in line with the liberal democratic pull that
supports an education system that is all-inclusive. Such a situation results in
school principals trying to justify the zero-tolerance policies by arguing that
the positioning of students can either be uniquely includable or excludable.
However, most schools so that to solve the tension resulting from the
implementation of zero-tolerance policies welcome the insertion of ‘choice' as
a strategy. To manage reputations schools tend to manage inappropriate conduct
by instilling good behavior onto students.
Zachary Levinsky puts forward various arguments in the
article concerning the implementation of zero-tolerance policies in schools
under the Safe Schools Act (SSA). According to Levinsky (2016), the enactment
of these policies has been envisaged as a war against the youths who are
regarded as a "generation of suspects" or "disposable." The
author argues to support the original SSA as it framed the good student while
making students governable through the element of choice. Students are
positioned to be right or lousy choosers by the use of the zero-tolerance
policies. Zachary Levinsky examines the original SSA implemented in Ontario’s
senior schools by interviewing students aged twelve to fourteen as well as
principals of senior schools. The author asserts that even though students were
regarded as capable of making the sound choices they were also assumed to have
developed immaturely as such they required educational guidance (Levinsky,
2016). Therefore, the article reveals that the governance of students’ through
personal choices produces and guarantees safety in schools.
In this article, Zachary Levinsky utilizes various social-legal methods where he uses this interdisciplinary approach in the analysis of legal and law phenomenon of policies while focusing on the relationship between the two concerning the greater society. According to Levinsky (2016) rules were made transparent so that to produce responsibilities and position students as choosers. The legal and law part of the implemented SSA stipulated the explicit rules and ramifications, where the process of suspension and expulsion was well elaborated. Consequently, it underlined the significance of safety and ensured that victims...